Re: MFJ QRP Cub vs Ten Tec 1340 QRP Transceiver

[ Follow Ups | Post Followup | Return to QRP Forum ]


Posted by:  K7VF

Posted On:  03/01/01

Subject:  Re: MFJ QRP Cub vs Ten Tec 1340 QRP Transceiver

Message Posted:
    In Reply to: MFJ QRP Cub vs Ten Tec 1340 QRP Transceiver posted by Joe Morris/WB6NMR on 12/14/00

I built the 1340 last month, and I'm very pleased with it. The manual was very clear, and construction straight forward. Even though I would like 500 Hz. selectivity, the 1 KHz. is sharp enough to seperate most signals. It has a nice sidetone, and seamless QSK. After about a 30 min. warmup, the drift is barely noticable. Very rugged cabinet. A real value.

Link:  Extinct DX QSL Page

Follow Ups:


Post a Followup

Name/Call:
E-Mail:
Subject:
Message to Post:
Use Fixed Width Font (Useful for lining up columns of data in log sheets)
Link URL:
(This can be a link to a web page or anything else.)
Link Name:
(This is an optional description or title for the URL above.)
Picture:
(This must be the full address of a .JPG or .GIF)
Check this box to receive an e-mail when someone replies to your message


 

[ Posting Rules | Follow Ups | Return to QRP Forum ]